Add Podcast Episode

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds some behavioral context by noting 'number (unique)' and listing required fields, going slightly beyond the annotations. However, it does not disclose idempotency, error behavior on duplicates, or authentication requirements, which are important for a create operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the action, and contains no filler. It efficiently communicates the core operation and required parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 10 parameters, no output schema, and annotations that provide no safety hints, the description is too sparse. It does not explain what 'art' refers to, what the return value will be, or any prerequisites or constraints beyond the unique number, leaving significant gaps for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 40%, and the description merely lists parameter names without explaining their meanings. For ambiguous fields like 'blurb' or 'appleUrl', no additional value is provided, and it repeats the schema's note about unique 'number' without elaboration.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Add a new podcast episode' with a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling list/update/delete episode tools. It also lists the required fields, which reinforces the purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like update_episode or other create tools. It simply states the action without any contextual comparison or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.