MCP-Powered Video RAG
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP-Powered Video RAG
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query local video timelines by extracting speech, frame captions, and on-screen text into a SQLite store, exposing search and retrieval tools via MCP.PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to transcribe audio/video files locally, generate SRT subtitles, and burn captions into videos via tool calls, without a cloud API.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables automated video learning workflows by ingesting video URLs, managing remote GPU ASR transcription, pulling transcripts, generating digest summaries, and searching local notes via MCP tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables ingesting YouTube videos into a persistent wiki knowledge base by combining transcripts with scene-change frame analysis, then answering questions over the compiled pages via full-text search and agent reasoning. Serves raw candidate pages and a wiki table of contents to MCP clients so their own model can reason without requiring an API key.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search, retrieve, transcribe, and summarize a local audio/video library over MCP, with timestamps and saved reports.4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to summarize, take notes on, and answer questions about YouTube, Bilibili, and Xiaohongshu videos by providing subtitles and local speech transcription with timestamps via MCP.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct action (ingest, search, ask, list, delete). The only potential overlap is search_video vs ask_video, since both retrieve transcript chunks, but the descriptions clearly differentiate raw chunk retrieval from LLM-generated answers with context.
All five tools follow a strict verb_noun snake_case pattern (ingest_video, search_video, ask_video, list_videos, delete_video). The convention is predictable and uniform.
Five tools is well-scoped for a video RAG system. Each tool covers a meaningful, non-redundant part of the workflow with no filler.
The surface covers the full lifecycle: ingestion, two retrieval modes (search and Q&A), listing indexed content, and deletion. Re-ingesting a video handles the update case, so there are no obvious dead ends.