Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
MCP-Powered Video RAG

MCP-Powered Video RAG

by aymanz12
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP-Powered Video RAG

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • vidsight

      szepix
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query local video timelines by extracting speech, frame captions, and on-screen text into a SQLite store, exposing search and retrieval tools via MCP.
      PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0

    • mcptube-vision

      judyfujita
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables ingesting YouTube videos into a persistent, searchable knowledge base by combining transcripts with scene-change vision analysis, then answering natural-language queries with citations. It supports MCP clients such as Claude and Copilot by exposing compiled cross-video knowledge for agentic reasoning.
      -

    • mcptube-vision

      panagiotisdiaz34
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables ingesting YouTube videos to build a persistent, cross-referenced wiki from transcripts and vision-analyzed frames, then supports agentic search and question answering through MCP clients like Claude and Copilot.
      -

    • mcptube-vision

      MichalFujita829
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables ingesting YouTube videos into a persistent, searchable wiki with transcript extraction, scene-change vision analysis, and cross-video knowledge compounding. MCP clients can then ask questions and receive reasoned answers with source citations.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct action (ingest, search, ask, list, delete). The only potential overlap is search_video vs ask_video, since both retrieve transcript chunks, but the descriptions clearly differentiate raw chunk retrieval from LLM-generated answers with context.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All five tools follow a strict verb_noun snake_case pattern (ingest_video, search_video, ask_video, list_videos, delete_video). The convention is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a video RAG system. Each tool covers a meaningful, non-redundant part of the workflow with no filler.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: ingestion, two retrieval modes (search and Q&A), listing indexed content, and deletion. Re-ingesting a video handles the update case, so there are no obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources