list_taxonomies
List all taxonomies available in the liquidus system to explore governance-tuple structures for provenance.
Instructions
browse: list taxonomies
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all taxonomies available in the liquidus system to explore governance-tuple structures for provenance.
browse: list taxonomies
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'browse: list taxonomies' with no mention of read-only nature, pagination, or effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short but under-specified. The phrase 'browse:' is filler and not helpful. Not structured informatively.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, description should hint at return value or structure. It does not, leaving significant gaps for a list operation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to add parameter details, but it adds no marginal value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states the action 'list' and resource 'taxonomies', but is very terse and does not differentiate from siblings beyond the resource name. 'browse:' prefix is ambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like list_products, get_order, etc. No context about filtering or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aygp-dr/liquidus-005'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server