Türk Hukuku İçtihat MCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| ictihat_araA | Türk yargı kararı arar; künye + atıf + Bir karara atıf yapmadan ÖNCE bunu çağır. Dönen her sonuç yapısal künye taşır
(mahkeme, esas_no, karar_no, karar_tarihi) ve hazır bir mahkeme: "adli" (Yargıtay + Bölge Adliye + ilk derece, UYAP Emsal — varsayılan), "idari" (Danıştay) ya da "anayasa" (AYM bireysel başvuru). adet: en çok kaç sonuç (1-50). sayfa: sayfalama (1'den başlar). |
| karar_getirA | Bir kararın resmî TAM metnini getirir (id + mahkeme, ictihat_ara sonucundan). Dönen |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: 'ictihat_ara' searches for precedents and returns identifiers, while 'karar_getir' retrieves the full text using those identifiers. There is no overlap or ambiguity.
Both tool names follow a consistent Turkish pattern of noun_verb ('karar_getir' and 'ictihat_ara'), using underscores and clear, descriptive terms.
With only two tools, the set is minimal but appropriately scoped for the core functionality of searching and retrieving full-text decisions. It is slightly below the typical range but still reasonable.
The tools cover the essential lifecycle of legal precedent retrieval: search with filtering and pagination, then get full text. There are no obvious gaps for the stated purpose.