Skip to main content
Glama
axionquant

AxionQuant MCP Server

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to AxionQuant MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to access stock prices, financial statements, earnings call transcripts, and fundamental data for 60,000+ public companies via 25 read-only tools.
      25
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with clean, normalized access to financial data including company fundamentals, insider trades, SEC filings, macro series from FRED, real-time quotes, and ETF holdings.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents access to financial data including SEC EDGAR filings, market fundamentals, insider trades, and price history without API keys.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with access to comprehensive financial data including real-time stock quotes, company fundamentals, financial statements, market analysis, SEC filings, and economic indicators through 253+ tools across 24 categories.
      315 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with real-time financial market intelligence including stock quotes, crypto data, technical analysis, and portfolio insights. Enables natural language queries for current prices, technical indicators, asset comparisons, and portfolio analysis.
      17
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 132 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are clearly distinguished by asset class prefix (etf_, crypto_, stocks_, etc.) and action, making most purposes unambiguous. However, the sheer volume and a few overlapping tools (e.g., econ_search vs econ_find, filings_search vs filings_recent) introduce minor potential for misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with a category prefix and descriptive suffix (e.g., etf_gainers, financials_pe, insiders_activity). Even across different asset classes and data types, the conventions are uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 132 tools, the count is extremely high, far exceeding the recommended range even for a comprehensive financial data server. This overwhelms the tool selection space and makes it difficult for agents to navigate, qualifying as an extreme mismatch per calibration.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers an extensive range of financial data: asset classes, quotes, historical prices, fundamentals, filings, sentiment, economic data, and more. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no options or bond-specific exposure tools), but overall coverage is strong for the apparent purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues