Skip to main content
Glama
awslabs

AWS SRA Verify MCP Server

Official
by awslabs

Related Servers

Alternatives to AWS SRA Verify MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run read-only AWS security audits and receive normalized, severity-ranked findings about account posture, such as stale access keys, missing MFA, public buckets, open security groups, and CloudTrail coverage.
      11
      19 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to perform automated compliance scanning of AWS infrastructure against PCI-DSS, CIS, and Well-Architected frameworks. It provides tools for scanning, remediation, and audit report generation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes read-only AWS security-posture checks as MCP tools, letting Claude Desktop, Claude Code and Cursor run 14 severity-ranked checks across S3, EC2, RDS, IAM and CloudTrail, describe resources, and produce a scored summary with prioritized risks. It ships an offline fixture estate so every tool works without credentials, and switches to a live account via a single environment variable.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to scan AWS accounts, build resource relationship graphs, detect unused resources, and export data via MCP tools.
      7
      4 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agents to query security checklists, protocols, and framework mappings to safely build and operate AI agents, with tools for checklist runs, protocol lookup, mapping lookup, and threat search.
      9
      CC BY-4.0

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: describing a specific check, listing checks by account type, listing checks by service, listing all services, and running a check. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., describe_check, list_checks_by_account_type). No deviations.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a security verification server, covering needs to list, describe, and run checks without excess or deficiency.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers listing (by service and account type), describing, and running checks. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated tool to retrieve historical results, but the core lifecycle is covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive