publish_asset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It details the return structure but does not disclose side effects, permissions required, potential errors, or whether the operation is reversible. The description is adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a single-sentence summary followed by Args and Returns sections. Every line adds value, and the most important information (purpose) is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema, the description provides a detailed Returns section listing key response fields. However, it does not explain error conditions, required permissions, or how this tool relates to other asset lifecycle tools (e.g., create_asset, get_listing). Nevertheless, the core behavior is well-covered.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It provides clear, concise descriptions for all four parameters (e.g., 'The ID of the domain containing the asset'), adding meaning beyond the schema titles. This fully compensates for the lack of schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Publishes an asset to the Amazon DataZone catalog,' which is a specific verb-resource combination. It distinguishes from siblings like create_asset (creates but does not publish) and get_asset (retrieves).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage (you must have an asset to publish) but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives such as create_asset or get_listing. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.