AWS Cost Explorer MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to AWS Cost Explorer MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables analyzing AWS cloud costs through natural language queries, providing cost summaries, anomaly detection, idle resource identification, rightsizing recommendations, and tagging compliance via Claude.109 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language analysis of AWS cloud costs, waste audits, and budget insights across multiple profiles and regions.MIT
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceA command-line interface and API that allows users to analyze and visualize AWS cloud spending data by enabling Claude to query AWS Cost Explorer through natural language conversations.4126MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying AWS costs and usage data from Claude Desktop through the Cost Explorer API.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables users to analyze AWS costs, track spending trends, and detect anomalies directly within Claude Desktop using the AWS Cost Explorer API. It provides tools to identify major cost drivers and compare usage across different time periods through natural language queries.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language control of AWS resources (EC2, Security Groups, S3, Bedrock, etc.) directly from Claude Desktop or Claude Code.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The tools have some overlap: get_bedrock_daily_usage_stats and get_detailed_breakdown_by_day both provide daily data, with the former being Bedrock-specific and the latter general. This could cause confusion about which tool to use for daily Bedrock costs. The hourly Bedrock tool and EC2 spend tool are distinct.
Naming is inconsistent: 'get_bedrock_daily_usage_stats' and 'get_bedrock_hourly_usage_stats' follow one pattern, while 'get_detailed_breakdown_by_day' and 'get_ec2_spend_last_day' use different structures (e.g., 'by_day' vs 'last_day', 'usage_stats' vs 'breakdown' vs 'spend').
With only 4 tools, the server feels under-scoped for a general 'AWS Cost Explorer' service. It covers only Bedrock and EC2, missing many other services and cost dimensions. However, for a focused subset, 4 tools could be reasonable.
The tooling covers only Bedrock daily/hourly stats, a generic daily breakdown, and EC2 daily spend. Missing other AWS services, monthly/forecast data, cost anomalies, tag-based queries, and broader exploration features. Significant gaps for a cost explorer tool.