d3p_reputation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description only states it 'get's data, implying read-only behavior. No disclosure of auth requirements, error handling, or rate limits. The minimal description does not compensate for the missing annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but includes a redundant parameter line that repeats schema information. It could be more concise by omitting the parameter details, making it less efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema, the description need not detail return values, but it fails to cover error scenarios, prerequisites, or behavior for invalid inputs. The tool is simple, yet the context is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description repeats the parameter name and type from the schema without adding meaning. Schema coverage is 0%, so the description should provide additional context (e.g., format, allowed values), but it does not.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool retrieves a reputation score and breakdown for a d3p service, using a specific verb-resource pair. Differentiates from sibling tools like d3p_list_services (which lists services) and d3p_check_compatibility.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description implies use for reputation queries but does not specify when not to use or mention any prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.