Skip to main content
Glama
awictor

flow-agent-mcp

by awictor

Related Servers

Alternatives to flow-agent-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol server for managing and diagnosing GlassFlow streaming pipelines, exposing pipeline CRUD, metrics queries, log search, and a composite diagnostic tool as MCP tools that AI agents can call over SSE transport.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes Azure Data Factory operations as tools any LLM can call — trigger pipelines, monitor runs, inspect datasets, and get factory health summaries through natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing read-only Snowflake metadata tools (schemas, tables, queries, lineage) for agentic data pipeline generation, enabling natural-language-to-pipeline workflows with dbt, Airflow, and Great Expectations.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: stats, logs, health, status, create, discover, etc. The health tool intentionally combines status and stats, but its description clearly delineates its role. Minor confusion is possible between task_status and task_health, but each serves a distinct need.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names mix noun-first patterns (task_stats, task_logs, task_health, task_status) with verb-first patterns (discover_bindings, create_capture, list_tasks). While all names use snake_case and are readable, the inconsistent prefix style makes the naming less predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is a well-scoped count for a Flow management server. It covers monitoring, lifecycle operations, discovery, and data verification without excessive overlap or unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers monitoring, creation, enable/disable, restart, and inspection well. However, there is no explicit delete or general update operation beyond toggling enabled state, which is a notable gap for full task lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues