add_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, so the description's 'Create' aligns. The return shape '{ ok, nodeId, name, type }' adds value beyond annotations, but no deeper behavioral context (e.g., where the page is created, side effects) is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One concise sentence with an added return-type note. Front-loaded, zero waste, and appropriately sized for a simple tool with one optional parameter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (1 optional parameter), annotations, and inclusion of return shape, the description is largely complete. However, it could benefit from context like 'in the current document' to clarify scope, though this is inferable from sibling tools and the domain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the 'name' parameter described as 'Optional page name'. The description adds that the page is 'optionally named', which is essentially redundant with the schema. No additional parameter meaning is provided beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the action ('Create a new page') and the optional naming behavior, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like delete_page, rename_page, and navigate_to_page.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage (when you want to create a page) but provides no explicit when-to-use guidance, exclusions, or alternatives. Context can be inferred from the tool name and sibling list, but it is not stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.