get_active_context

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description only states it returns a JSON string with context info, but lacks disclosure of side effects, performance implications, or any behavioral traits. As the sole source of behavioral info, it is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two lines state purpose, one line notes return format. No filler, front-loaded with key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with no parameters and an output schema (not shown but exists), the description is adequate. It names the components of context, but could clarify the scope of 'active context' or mention that it's a snapshot.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, and schema description coverage is 100%. Baseline for zero parameters is 4. The description adds no parameter info, which is acceptable given no params.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool retrieves lightweight context including window, cursor, and monitors. It is distinct from sibling tools that capture screens or list monitors, but could explicitly mention that it returns a summary rather than raw data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_monitors or capture_window. The description does not provide context for appropriate usage scenarios or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.