Skip to main content
Glama
auxiliar-ai

auxiliar-mcp

Official
by auxiliar-ai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to auxiliar-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • cross-validated-search

      wd041216-bit
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Universal Search-First Knowledge Acquisition Plugin for LLMs. Enables real-time web search and deep page browsing via MCP or CLI. Zero-cost, privacy-first, supports DuckDuckGo, Bing, Google, Brave, Wikipedia, Arxiv, YouTube, Reddit and more.
      2
      13
      16
      MIT

    • Web Eyes

      slothitude
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to search, crawl, summarize, and analyze web pages and images via a pipeline of web intelligence tools.
      -

    • graph-tool-call

      SonAIengine
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Graph-based tool retrieval for LLM agents. Builds a tool graph from OpenAPI/MCP specs and retrieves multi-step workflows via hybrid search (BM25 + graph traversal + embedding), recovering accuracy from 12% to 82% with 79% fewer tokens. Also works as an MCP Proxy to aggregate multiple servers behind 3 meta-tools.
      6
      16
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: about_auxiliar introduces the service, get_provider details a single provider, get_scorecard shows benchmarks for a verb, and recommend_tools recommends providers. No overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (about_auxiliar, get_provider, get_scorecard, recommend_tools), making them predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools covering onboarding, provider details, benchmarks, and recommendations, the count is well-scoped for an information-focused MCP server about a gateway service.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the main user needs: understanding, provider details, benchmarks, and recommendations. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to list all providers or verbs, but recommend_tools partially addresses this by taking a job as input.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources