Skip to main content
Glama
automatiabcn

invoiceflow-mcp

by automatiabcn

Related Servers

Alternatives to invoiceflow-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search and inspect an invoice ledger, generate VAT summaries, run OCR on local documents, and use reusable prompts for chasing overdue invoices and reconciling entries.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and finance teams to extract structured fields from messy invoices and audit them before payment, applying seven evidence-backed risk rules that catch total/tax mismatches, duplicate invoices, missing fields, future dates, and round amounts, then returning a 0–100 score with a payment link. Exposes four MCP tools over stdio and Streamable HTTP (spec 2025-11-25) plus a web UI, backed by an optional AWS Bedrock or OpenAI-compatible extraction brain that degrades gracefully to a zero-dependency offline engine.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local desktop AI assistants to query and use invoicing and business data through 15 MCP tools, with no hosted server required.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI agents read access to subscription/SaaS invoice history, ingested from Gmail and stored in Postgres and MongoDB, with tools for listing invoices, retrieving PDFs, and summarizing spend.
      441 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: portfolio summary, client management, invoice creation, demo seeding, invoice listing, payment recording, reminder tracking, risk prediction, PDF generation/delivery, and external payment reconciliation. No functional overlap exists.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a noun_verb pattern (e.g., invoice_create, invoice_list), but invoice_risk and invoice_demo_seed deviate (noun_noun and noun_noun_verb), and cashflow_report could be interpreted as compound noun. Inconsistent imperative style.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools is well-scoped for an invoicing system, covering core workflows (client, invoice, payment, report, risk) without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness3/5

    Missing client listing/deletion and invoice update/deletion; lacks refund handling. Demo seeding and risk tools add value, but CRUD gaps may cause agent failures in some workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues