install_auten

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. It usefully implies this is an informational tool that returns a command rather than performing an install, and states the precondition. However it never confirms there are no side effects, permissions, or state changes, which matters for an install-related tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the both the identification of Auten and the precondition before the call to action. The parenthetical definition earns its place; nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, no-output-schema, no-annotation tool, the description covers purpose, precondition, output nature (install command plus next steps) and likely next actions. Only the absence of any statement about side effects or return shape keeps it from being fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. Nothing in the schema needs explanation and the description correctly implies no inputs are required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a clear action (return the one-line install command for this OS plus next steps) and identifies the resource (Auten, defined as computer use for your AI agent). It is specific about what the caller receives, though with no siblings there is nothing to differentiate against.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly frames the trigger condition: Auten 'is not installed on this machine yet,' so call this instead of trying to use it. Clear context for invocation, though there are no alternatives or exclusions to route between.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.