Skip to main content
Glama
austinulfers

csibridge-mcp

by austinulfers
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to csibridge-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Qiao-MCP

      SorataYang
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with bridge structural analysis software for modeling, construction stages, and code checking.
      132
      Apache 2.0

    • ETABS MCP Server

      mdvaleed7
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to CSI ETABS for structural engineering tasks, enabling model creation, analysis, design, and seismic checks via the COM API.
      69
      9
      MIT

    • OpenSTAAD MCP Server

      DP065U
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with Bentley STAAD.Pro models for tasks like load case definition, data extraction, and property setting, running locally with multi-instance support and no cloud dependency.
      5
      MIT

    • CSI ETABS MCP Bridge

      Aaradhya-Dev-Tamrakar
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to directly control CSI ETABS for structural and seismic analysis, including model inspection, material/section definition, frame generation, solver execution, and result extraction through natural language.
      MIT
    • OpenSTAAD MCP Server by BentleySystems

      OpenSTAAD MCP Serverofficial

      BentleySystems
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with Bentley STAAD.Pro models for tasks like load case definition, data extraction, and property setting through natural language.
      5
      49
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions (status vs connect, list/get/edit_table, call vs batch, job_wait). The three discovery tools api_search/api_describe/api_enum overlap somewhat in intent, and the generic `call` tool conceptually overlaps with many specific tools, but descriptions differentiate them reasonably well.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Predominantly consistent snake_case with verb_noun or noun_action patterns (list_tables, get_table, edit_table, run_analysis, open_model, save_model, api_search). A few single-word tools (status, connect, call, batch) deviate slightly but remain clear and idiomatic.

    Tool Count5/5

    15 tools is well within a healthy range for a complex bridge-engineering API. Each tool earns its place: lifecycle (new/open/save), execution (run_analysis/job_wait), table I/O (list/get/edit), discovery (api_*), and generic escape hatches (call/batch).

    Completeness4/5

    Covers connection, model lifecycle, analysis, table read/write, discovery, and arbitrary API calls plus batching, giving near-complete coverage via the generic `call`. Minor gaps like closing/disconnecting a model or instance explicitly are absent but workable around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources