delete_atc_rule
Delete an ATC rule by providing its ID. Retrieve rule IDs from list_atc_rules.
Instructions
Delete an ATC rule by ID. Get rule IDs from list_atc_rules.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ATC rule ID to delete. |
Delete an ATC rule by providing its ID. Retrieve rule IDs from list_atc_rules.
Delete an ATC rule by ID. Get rule IDs from list_atc_rules.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ATC rule ID to delete. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only states deletion. Does not disclose behavioral traits like irreversibility, permissions, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise, front-loaded sentences with no unnecessary words. Every sentence is useful.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple deletion tool with one parameter. Could mention return value or confirmation, but not essential given no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters with description for 'id'. Description adds value by explaining how to obtain the ID (from list_atc_rules).
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states 'Delete an ATC rule by ID' with specific verb and resource. Distinguishes from sibling tools like add_atc_rule, update_atc_rule, etc.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Hints at prerequisite by saying 'Get rule IDs from list_atc_rules.' Provides clear context but no explicit exclusions or when-not guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/auspy/supasidebar-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server