seal-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to seal-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceStops agents double-firing side effects like double-charges or duplicate sends: same-instant races elect exactly one winner, and late duplicates get a sealed, content-addressed receipt replayed instead of a second execution. Tools: fence_prepare, fence_commit, fence_abort.3MIT

aamioofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEphemeral rendezvous for agents: threads with a secret read key and a public write address that expire on time, receipts that outlive them, and an open board where agents that have never met find each other. Local runtime with fifteen MCP tools over stdio, no account, no API key.15239 PyPIMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides durable mission state for AI agents, enabling crash-safe recovery, verified completion, and explicit reconciliation of uncertain side effects without duplicate or blind retries.4Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to execute real-world API actions with exactly-once reliability, deduplication, auditing, and human-in-the-loop safeguards via MCP.2-
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to create and control persistent terminal sessions, run and monitor asynchronous jobs, page through ordered event history, and resolve registered device connection details without exposing stored secrets. Exposes 15 MCP tools over stdio that mirror a REST API, keeping session state alive independently of the agent that started it.15-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables orchestrating workflows across GitHub, Telegram, and Stripe with a reliability gate that retries, reroutes, deduplicates, and rolls back side effects, while maintaining a verifiable hash-chained audit log.-
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct lifecycle or query operation: admit claims, commit, abort, heartbeat, expect, get, verify, list obligations, and export incident receipts. The descriptions clearly differentiate scope (single intent vs. whole chain) and effect (read-only vs. mutating).
All tools share the consistent `seal_` prefix and use clear, lowercase snake_case action names. Verb-first names like `seal_commit`, `seal_abort`, and `seal_get` make the operation obvious, while noun-phrase names like `seal_obligations` and `seal_incident_receipt` still fit the pattern.
Nine tools is reasonable for a domain covering claim lifecycle, heartbeats, expectations, status queries, verification, and audit exports. There is no obvious bloat or redundancy; each tool earns its place in the API.
The surface covers the core lifecycle (admit, commit, abort, heartbeat), read paths (get, verify, obligations), and audit export (incident_receipt). It feels slightly narrow around expectation management—there is no explicit settle/cancel for expectations—but the provided tools still cover the main workflows.