akai_distribute

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. It discloses zero behavioral traits: no mention of side effects, permissions, destructive potential, rate limits, or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely short, but not concise—it wastes the sentence on a tautology. The one-liner offers minimal utility and lacks structure (e.g., no separation of overview from details).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 2 parameters and no output schema or annotations, the description is critically incomplete. An agent cannot infer what the tool does, what it returns, or any side effects, leaving it unusable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema coverage is 100%, the description adds no meaning beyond the schema's own parameter descriptions. The parameter descriptions are generic ('CLI arguments to pass to the operator'), and the tool description fails to clarify their role or format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'AkaiDistribute operator. (category: artifacts)' is a tautology that merely restates the name with 'operator' and appends a vague category. It fails to specify what the tool distributes, how it distributes, or to where, leaving the purpose unclear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the 90+ sibling tools (e.g., akai_pack, akai_queue, akai_workflow). There are no examples, prerequisites, or alternative recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.