Skip to main content
Glama
aureTheDev

protonpass-mcp

by aureTheDev

create_login

Create a new login entry in a Proton Pass vault by providing the vault ID and title, and optionally a username, password, URL, and note.

Instructions

Create a new login credential item in a vault.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlNoWebsite URL (optional)
noteNoSecure note attached to this item (optional)
titleYesItem title
passwordNoPassword (optional)
usernameNoUsername or email (optional)
vault_idYesVault share ID
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It only states the create action without disclosing behavioral details such as vault existence requirements, password generation behavior, or what happens after creation. No safety or side-effect information is provided.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no filler words. It conveys the core purpose without unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema or annotations, and the description does not explain return values, side effects, or usage context relative to sibling tools. Given the complexity of 6 parameters and the create semantics, the description is insufficient for an agent to fully understand how to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides descriptions for all 6 parameters, so the description adds no additional parameter semantics. The term 'login credential' aligns with username/password fields, but this is redundant with the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a new login credential item, specifying the resource type (login credential) and location (in a vault), which differentiates it from sibling create_note and create_vault tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool over alternatives like create_note or update_item. There is no mention of prerequisites, exclusions, or recommended use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aureTheDev/protonpass-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server