projectlibre-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to projectlibre-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for Microsoft Project that reads, analyzes, and writes .mpp, .xer, and .xml schedule files, offering critical path analysis, DCMA 14-point assessment, and verified writes without requiring Java or Microsoft Project.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives LLMs read-only access to Microsoft Project Online (Project for the Web) via the Microsoft Graph API.22 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables LLMs to read and analyze Microsoft Project schedules, including critical path, resources, and advanced construction planning layers (AWP and LPS) for work packages and Lean planning.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for accurately reading and writing Excel .xlsx files while preserving structure, styles, and formulas. Provides tools for inspecting, editing, and aggregating spreadsheet data, with optional LibreOffice recalculation.202MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for PDF analysis that enables text extraction, image extraction, metadata retrieval, and text search via natural language.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for AI clients to browse and search project files securely, with configurable permissions, virtual paths, and key-based access.-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a distinct and clear purpose: file discovery (list_projects), project overview (get_project_summary), task listing with filters (list_tasks), and schedule analysis (analyze_schedule). There is no overlap or ambiguity among them.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (list_projects, list_tasks, get_project_summary, analyze_schedule). This makes the naming predictable and easy to understand.
With 4 tools, the set is well-scoped for a ProjectLibre analysis server. Each tool serves a necessary function without being excessive or insufficient for common project management queries.
The tools cover the core analysis workflow: finding files, summarizing, listing tasks with filters, and performing schedule analysis. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for detailed single-task info or resource data), but these do not hinder typical use cases for a read-only analytical server.