get_audio_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only says 'get' implying read-only, but does not disclose what details are returned, authentication needs, or any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise with one sentence, front-loaded verb. No wasted words, though could benefit from brief context on return value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks output schema and does not describe what 'details' means. Incomplete for a tool that likely returns structured data; agent cannot infer what fields are available.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%; description adds no meaning beyond the parameter name 'audio_id' and type integer. Does not explain how to obtain the ID or its format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description explicitly states it gets audio details by ID, clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like download_sample, list_audios, and upload_audio.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use vs alternatives, such as list_audios for browsing. Only implies usage when an ID is known.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.