cart_get
Retrieve current cart contents and totals from your selected grocery provider.
Instructions
Get current cart contents and totals.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| provider | No | Shopping provider id (default: "countdown"). |
Retrieve current cart contents and totals from your selected grocery provider.
Get current cart contents and totals.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| provider | No | Shopping provider id (default: "countdown"). |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states 'Get current cart contents and totals' without disclosing authentication requirements, behavior for new users, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise at one sentence, front-loading the purpose. It could add slightly more detail without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description should explain return format or behavior. It mentions 'contents and totals' but lacks detail. Also no notes on user-specific context or login requirements.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'provider', which is already described. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, but meets baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it retrieves current cart contents and totals, using a specific verb 'Get' and resource 'current cart'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like cart_add, cart_remove, cart_update which modify the cart.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for retrieving the current cart state but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like cart_add or cart_remove. No guidance on prerequisites or when not to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/auckland-ai-collective/trundler'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server