list_sims
List available iOS simulators on your system to identify devices for running and testing applications.
Instructions
[XcodeBuildMCP] List iOS simulators.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| enabled | No |
List available iOS simulators on your system to identify devices for running and testing applications.
[XcodeBuildMCP] List iOS simulators.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| enabled | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations available, the description carries the full burden of behavioral context. It provides no detail beyond the verb 'list', no mention of output format, filtering, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the purpose and wastes no space.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Even for a simple tool, the description is incomplete. It lacks any explanation of the 'enabled' parameter, return value, or usage context, and there are no annotations or output schema to fill the gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has one optional boolean parameter 'enabled' with no description, and the description does not mention it. Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not compensate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists iOS simulators, which is specific and a read operation. It does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools, but the action is distinct enough that ambiguity is low.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of use cases, prerequisites, or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/atz-dsampath/rn-sim-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server