Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
attorneynate

oyez-mcp

by attorneynate
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to oyez-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Oyez SCOTUS MCP

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and retrieve US Supreme Court case data from Oyez — case summaries, questions presented, decisions, majority/dissent lineups, advocates, and oral-argument audio availability — by term year, case-name substring, or docket number.
      312 npm
      MIT

    • mcp-docket-alarm

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to search and retrieve court docket records across US state, county, and federal courts, including PACER party searches, and to get full case details.
      9 npm
      MIT

    • FTC Enforcement

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching the FTC's public case and proceeding record — merger and non-merger (conduct) competition enforcement plus consumer-protection matters — by company, individual, case/matter number, topic, status, or date, and pulling full case detail such as status, federal court, party caption, summary, linked press release, and a document timeline with filing dates and PDF links. Also surfaces the newest cases and filings over a configurable recent window.
      231 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: search by query, list by Term, fetch case details, fetch oral argument transcript, and fetch opinion announcement transcript. The only mild overlap is between search_cases and list_term_cases (both return case lists), but their descriptions clearly differentiate query-based search from Term browsing.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use consistent snake_case with a clear verb_noun pattern: get_oral_argument, search_cases, get_case, list_term_cases, get_opinion_announcement. The verbs (get, search, list) are used appropriately and unambiguously.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a read-only legal data server, covering search, browse, case details, and two transcript types. Each tool has a clear, non-redundant purpose, and the count is comfortably within the ideal range.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core workflows: finding cases, listing Terms, retrieving case details, and fetching both oral argument and opinion announcement transcripts. Minor gaps exist—no direct retrieval of opinion text (only links) or audio recordings—but these are workable through the provided details.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources