Skip to main content
Glama
attestagents

attest-mcp

Official
by attestagents
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to attest-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • storefront-guard-mcp-server

      maxigirl123
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI shopping agents to verify a storefront's legitimacy before committing payment by checking domain registration, SSL certificate history, HTTPS validity, and known-scam blocklists, returning a trust score with explainable reasons and a clear recommendation.
      1
      139 npm
      -

    • pulsefeed-x402-mcp

      Nikolife2016
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Before an AI agent pays an x402 endpoint, checks whether it's safe to pay: liveness, scam/anomaly scan (payTo hijack, bait-and-switch, honeypot), and on-chain receiver verification. ~70% of x402 endpoints are dead or scams.
      3
      MIT
    • Cybercentry MCP Server by Cybercentry

      Cybercentry MCP Serverofficial

      Cybercentry
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform pay-per-call security verification of wallets, tokens, contracts, dApps, agents, and more via a remote endpoint with no installation.
      2
      MIT

    • Cerberus

      lz-123123
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a three-layer payment firewall for AI agents, enabling identity verification, risk screening, and execution authorization with on-chain policy enforcement for secure and auditable transactions.
      209 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly distinct: attest_scan performs a full scan of an endpoint and returns a grade, while attest_grade retrieves a previously cached grade. There is no ambiguity about which to use.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the consistent verb_noun pattern 'attest_scan' and 'attest_grade', using the same prefix and a clear action word.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only two tools, the set is minimal but focused. It covers the core scan-and-check workflow without unnecessary bloat. A third tool for listing or managing hosts would be nice but is not essential.

    Completeness3/5

    The two tools cover the primary use case of scanning and retrieving grades, but there are missing operations like listing all scanned hosts, deleting a host, or forcing a rescan. The surface is somewhat incomplete for lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources