Skip to main content
Glama
atlasprzetargow

Atlas Przetargów

Related Servers

Alternatives to Atlas Przetargów

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching and analyzing Polish public procurement tenders from BZP and TED, including filtering, tender details and timelines, offers and contract values, buyer/contractor profiles, CPV code lookup, and regional statistics, with optional AI-summary endpoints.
      12
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and retrieve Poland's official public procurement notices from the e-Zamówienia/BZP bulletin without any API key, covering the latest published contract notices as well as filtering by keyword, CPV code, date range, or contracting authority.
      20 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Gives Claude direct, keyless access to Polish public registries: it validates NIP checksums, checks a company's VAT status and bank account against the VAT whitelist, pulls KRS court-registry extracts, and fetches the correct NBP exchange rate for an invoice date. Runs locally as an MCP server for Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and other MCP clients.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes French and EU public procurement data (BOAMP + TED) as MCP tools for AI agents, enabling search for tenders, awards, and winner intelligence via typed filters.
      4
      62 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants such as Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor to search Korean public procurement bid announcements, view detailed bid information, access pre-specifications, and analyze award history from 나라장터 (Public Procurement Service), with source links and no installation or API key required for basic use.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. For example, get_buyer retrieves buyer profiles, get_tender fetches specific tender details, and search_tenders performs broader searches, each targeting different resources and actions. The descriptions explicitly differentiate their functions, making misselection unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern, such as get_buyer, search_tenders, and get_category_stats. This uniformity enhances readability and predictability, with no deviations in naming conventions across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the count is well-scoped for the server's purpose of Polish public procurement analysis. Each tool earns its place by covering distinct aspects like entity profiles, tender searches, and statistical data, avoiding both thinness and overload.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for the domain, including CRUD-like operations such as fetching entities and tenders, searching with filters, and retrieving statistical insights. There are no obvious gaps, as it supports due diligence, market analysis, and competitive benchmarking workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues