create-page-simple

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description adds some behavioral context: parent can be page_id or data_source_id, title is auto-mapped, and supported Markdown syntax is listed. However, it lacks details about error handling, permission requirements, or what happens if both parent fields are provided.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with purpose. It contains no fluff, though the Markdown syntax list could be more structured. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters and no output schema or annotations, the description covers parent and content well but leaves gaps: properties and icon are not explained in depth, return value is omitted, and no comparison to siblings is provided.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (baseline 3). The description adds meaningful context for 3 of 5 parameters: clarifies parent options, explains title auto-mapping, and lists supported Markdown features for content. Icon gets slight enhancement with examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a page using Markdown, with specific verb 'Create' and resource 'page'. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'create-page', leaving some ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., 'create-page' or 'create-database'). It does not mention prerequisites, limitations, or conditions that would help an agent decide.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.