Skip to main content
Glama
athoune

prospector-mcp

by athoune

Related Servers

Alternatives to prospector-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run Python static analysis and receive evidence-backed findings with causation traces, reproducible witnesses, and suggested verified patches.
      3
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables dependency, security, and coding convention checks for Python and Java projects via MCP tools. Supports local paths or Git URLs.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an MCP client to inspect a local Python project directory, reporting its package-manager signals, local Python environment, and available tooling. It also runs Ruff lint and formatting checks and returns the outcomes as structured results, without modifying the project or installing dependencies into it.
      3
      GPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to scan codebases for prioritized findings (TODO, FIXME, XXX) and retrieve results in table, JSON, or SARIF format via MCP.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables evaluating Python projects against a deterministic quality bar using analyzer findings, per-dimension scores, and a review verdict, exposed through MCP tools, resources, and prompts. Users can run evaluations, inspect rules, and list analyzers to assess code readiness for review.
      3
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one runs the analysis, the other checks installation. No overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent 'prospector_' prefix with a verb (run, check_ready). Clear and predictable pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    Only 2 tools for a static analysis server feels minimal but not unreasonable if the scope is limited to running checks.

    Completeness2/5

    Missing common operations like listing rules, retrieving results, or configuring the analysis. Gaps are significant for a typical analysis workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues