list_stores
Retrieve a list of all stores connected to your Lemon Squeezy account.
Instructions
List all Lemon Squeezy stores.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve a list of all stores connected to your Lemon Squeezy account.
List all Lemon Squeezy stores.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the burden. 'List' implies read-only, but the description does not explicitly state read-only behavior or any other traits like side effects. No contradictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single, straightforward sentence with no wasted words. Front-loaded with verb and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a parameterless list tool, the description is minimally adequate. However, it could mention that it returns all stores or that it is a read-only operation, but given simplicity, a score of 3 is appropriate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter info, which is acceptable given zero parameters. Baseline at 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List all Lemon Squeezy stores' clearly indicates the verb 'List' and the resource 'stores'. It distinguishes from sibling 'get_store' which would retrieve a single store.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
While the description is implicit in its purpose, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives like 'get_store' for a specific store. No when-not guidance is provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/atharvagupta2003/mcp-lemonsqueezy'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server