Skip to main content
Glama
atfinke
by atfinke

Scan Movie Availability

fandango_scan_movie_availability
Read-only

Check movie showtime availability across multiple dates and nearby theaters, with optional seat count and seat map details.

Instructions

Scan one movie across a date range and nearby theaters. Optionally attaches seat counts for available showtimes. This is read-only and capped at 31 days.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
latNoSearch latitude.
zipNoSearch ZIP code.
daysYesNumber of dates to scan, capped at 31.
longNoSearch longitude.
formatNoOptional format filter, e.g. IMAX 70MM.
movieIdYesFandango movie id, for example 241283.
startDateYesFirst show date in YYYY-MM-DD.
includeSeatCountsNoWhen true, fetch seat-map counts for available showtimes with showtimeHashCode.
maxSeatMapFetchesNoMaximum seat-map requests when includeSeatCounts/includeSeatDetails is true. Default: 100.
includeSeatDetailsNoWhen true, fetch and include full normalized seat maps plus best open-seat groups.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, but the description adds the 31-day cap and optional seat count behavior beyond structured data. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences with front-loaded purpose and no unnecessary words. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 10 parameters and no output schema, the description does not explain what the tool returns (e.g., list of showtimes, theaters) and is too minimal given the complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds minimal additional meaning beyond stating optional seat counts, which is already implied by the corresponding parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (scan), the resources (movie, date range, nearby theaters), and optional behavior (seat counts). It distinguishes from siblings like fandango_movie_showtimes by emphasizing a broad scan across dates and locations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for scanning availability across date range and theaters but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over siblings or provide exclusions. Context is clear but no alternative guidance is offered.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/atfinke/fandango-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server