Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to aso-audit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing App Store Optimization: add apps, track keywords, pull health reports, spy on competitors, find keyword opportunities, and write AI copy suggestions.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that connects Cursor, Claude Desktop, and other MCP clients to the official App Store Connect API—so you can manage iOS/macOS apps, TestFlight, in-app subscriptions, and store metadata via chat or automated tool calls.
      69
      76 npm
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Bridges MCP clients such as Cursor, Claude Code and Claude Desktop to the Ascope server running locally on your Mac, so you can read App Store keyword rankings, popularity and difficulty scores, research or suggest keywords, and add, remove or refresh the apps and keywords you track. Everything stays on your machine with no API key required.
      92 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that exposes the entire Apple App Store Connect API (1,200+ operations) as MCP tools, enabling AI assistants to query apps, manage builds, handle submissions, read analytics, and more.
      16 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for ShipLocale that lets Claude read and edit localized App Store and Google Play metadata, including app copy, release notes, and screenshot texts, with optional push to live listings.
      20
      6 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct ASO-related task: holistic audit, field character check, limit retrieval, and keyword cleanup. No overlap in purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (audit_metadata, check_field, get_limits, keyword_field_check), making them predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    4 tools is a focused, appropriate set for ASO metadata auditing—neither too sparse nor excessive for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers core metadata tasks (audit, specific field check, limits, keyword optimization). Minor gaps exist, such as missing tools for full report generation or screenshot analysis.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues