Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to qa-screens

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to see, measure, and verify web pages through a real Chrome browser, including screenshots, responsive layout and accessibility audits, pixel diffing against baselines, secure logins, and deployed-fix verification.
      27
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to see, analyze, and visually verify web page changes through pixel-perfect diffing, theme extraction, layout analysis, and interactive element detection.
      19 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Screenshot, visual-diff, and AI page-analysis API for AI agents. Capture any URL as PNG, JPEG, WebP, PDF, or HTML, diff two versions of a page to catch visual regressions, and get an AI summary of what a page contains.
      3
      44 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to capture website screenshots, automate browser interactions, and manage recurring screenshot configurations across 150+ global locations. It also supports AI-powered domain research and visual change monitoring for any web page.
      16 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI-driven UI inspection and optimization by scanning websites with configurable viewports, capturing screenshots, running deterministic accessibility and layout checks, and generating prioritized reports with fix prompts.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: run_qa vs qa_page, capture vs capture_set, and compare_images vs compare_sets vs ab_compare are separated by scope. The main ambiguity is between auth_browser_login and auth_oauth_login, though their descriptions clarify the different login flows.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a mostly predictable snake_case style, with useful prefixes like qa_ and auth_. However, the pattern is not strictly verb_noun: capture and ab_compare stand out, and names like qa_config or error_reports are noun-style rather than action-first.

    Tool Count3/5

    18 tools is on the heavy side, especially considering the 7-tool auth sub-system alongside the core screenshot/compare workflow. It is not excessive in absolute terms, but it crosses into the range where the set starts to feel bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The core visual QA lifecycle is well covered: references, captures, comparisons, set diffs, and running-server diffs are all present, and auth profile management is thorough. Minor gaps exist such as no direct tool for deleting references or listing capture sets, but these can be worked around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues