Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to assetfare

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users and agents to obtain MEV-protected multichain swap and cross-chain bridge quotes, check supported chains, and generate prefilled swap URLs, with gasless Permit2 execution and x402 or API-key access.
      107 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to compare rates across 100+ blockchains and 15+ liquidity providers, create non-custodial cross-chain swaps, and track transaction status without any API key. It exposes tools for listing currencies, quoting swaps with AI-ranked routing tags, generating deposit addresses, and monitoring exchanges to completion.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to obtain on-chain DEX aggregator quotes computed by the on-chain Quoter contract through their own RPC node, returning verified unsigned swap calldata, simulations, token info, deployment registry checks, and live staking solvency. All tools are read-only and keyless, so the agent never signs or holds a private key.
      7
      201 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to request Jupiter swap quotes, build unsigned Solana swap transactions for user signing, and access paid token-risk and wallet-portfolio data via x402.
      4
      85 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform complex crypto operations like cross-chain routing, contract decoding, portfolio management, and anti-rug security checks, returning unsigned transactions for safe signing by the agent.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The tool set exposes two parallel generations of the same workflow (legacy v1 and v2), producing near-duplicate concepts: quote/status/session/create/prepare/observe tools exist in both families. Within v2, route_selection, quote, quote_selected_candidate, prepare, and session_create have closely related boundaries, and several descriptions explicitly warn agents not to use the wrong tool, which is evidence of real confusion.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are almost entirely snake_case with a consistent assetfare_ or assetfare_v2_ prefix, and lifecycle verbs are generally predictable (quote, prepare, session_get, observe_source). Minor deviations exist, such as noun-first capabilities/manifest and legacy unversioned names contrasting with the v2 prefix, but the overall pattern is readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    24 tools is heavy and is inflated by maintaining both legacy v1 and v2 surfaces side by side. The domain is complex enough to justify many operations, but a cleaner server would likely consolidate or retire the legacy set.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers capabilities, manifest verification, quoting, route selection, session creation, preparation, source/output observation, refresh, wallet auth, and legacy CCTP destination flow. Minor lifecycle gaps remain, such as explicit session cancellation or listing, but core end-to-end workflows are represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessLimited data