trim_text

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not explain side effects on the file (e.g., whether it modifies the original file), permission requirements, or error behavior. The return value is mentioned but not error cases or potential irreversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief, consisting of two sentences that focus on the core action and result. It is front-loaded, avoids redundancy, and every sentence provides value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and parameter descriptions, the description is insufficient. It omits critical context such as how to specify the range, whether the operation modifies the original file, and when to use this tool over sibling trimming tools. The output schema may cover return values, but operational guidance is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain parameters beyond implying trim_text and _range. The format of _range, the meaning of worksheet, and the purpose of file_token are left to the schema, which lacks descriptions. Parameter names are somewhat self-explanatory, but the description adds no semantic detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (removes), the target (text values), the scope (specified range of a worksheet in an Excel file), and the return value (True). It effectively distinguishes itself from sibling tools like trim_text_from_leading and trim_text_from_trailing by covering both leading and trailing characters.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as trim_text_from_leading or trim_text_from_trailing. The description does not mention any prerequisites, exclusions, or comparative scenarios, leaving the agent without direction on choosing this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.