Skip to main content
Glama
asky74

mcp-server-atlassian-jira

by asky74

Jira PUT Request

jira_put
Read-only

Replace Jira resources using PUT requests to fully update issues, projects, or properties. Provide the endpoint path and body with new field values.

Instructions

Replace Jira resources (full update). Returns TOON format by default.

IMPORTANT - Cost Optimization: Use jq param to extract only needed fields from response

Output format: TOON (default) or JSON (outputFormat: "json")

Common operations:

  1. Update issue (full): /rest/api/3/issue/{issueIdOrKey} body: {"fields": {"summary": "New title", "description": {...}, "assignee": {"accountId": "..."}}}

  2. Update project: /rest/api/3/project/{projectIdOrKey} body: {"name": "New Project Name", "description": "Updated description"}

  3. Set issue property: /rest/api/3/issue/{issueIdOrKey}/properties/{propertyKey} body: {"value": "property value"}

Note: PUT replaces the entire resource. For partial updates, prefer PATCH.

API reference: https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/jira/platform/rest/v3/

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
jqNoJMESPath expression to filter/transform the response. IMPORTANT: Always use this to extract only needed fields and reduce token costs. Examples: "issues[*].{key: key, summary: fields.summary}" (extract specific fields), "issues[0]" (first result), "issues[*].key" (keys only). See https://jmespath.org
bodyYesRequest body as a JSON object. Structure depends on the endpoint. Example for issue: {"fields": {"project": {"key": "PROJ"}, "summary": "Issue title", "issuetype": {"name": "Task"}}}
pathYesThe Jira API endpoint path (without base URL). Must start with "/". Examples: "/rest/api/3/project", "/rest/api/3/search/jql", "/rest/api/3/issue/{issueIdOrKey}"
queryParamsNoOptional query parameters as key-value pairs. Examples: {"maxResults": "50", "startAt": "0", "jql": "project=PROJ", "fields": "summary,status"}
outputFormatNoOutput format: "toon" (default, 30-60% fewer tokens) or "json". TOON is optimized for LLMs with tabular arrays and minimal syntax.
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description correctly states that PUT performs a full update, which is a write operation. However, the annotations set readOnlyHint=true, directly contradicting the description's behavior. This is a serious inconsistency, scoring 1 as per guidelines.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with sections and markdown, front-loading key information. It is somewhat lengthy but each part serves a purpose (examples, cost tips, note on PATCH). Minor redundancy in API reference URL.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and nested objects, the description provides rich context: common operations, examples, output format details, and cost optimization. It lacks explicit explanation of TOON format behavior but covers most aspects adequately.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, baseline 3. The description adds value by explaining the jq parameter for cost reduction, providing concrete examples for path and body, and detailing outputFormat. This goes beyond the schema's basic descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool replaces Jira resources via full update. It lists specific endpoints and operations, and distinguishes from PATCH for partial updates. The verb 'Replace' and resource context are well-defined.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises using jq for cost optimization, specifies default output format (TOON), and mentions that PUT is for full replacement while PATCH is for partial updates. This provides clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/asky74/mcp-server-atlassian-jira'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server