Spoor
# Spoor
**Spoor tells an AI agent what changed in your services, and where it started, in a few hundred tokens.**
[](https://github.com/asinha07/spoor/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
[](LICENSE)
[](https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/asinha07/spoor)
Website: **[telespoor.com](https://telespoor.com)**
Spoor is an open-source [MCP](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) server and CLI for your observability backends:
the VictoriaMetrics stack, Prometheus, Loki, Tempo and New Relic. When something breaks, an agent asks Spoor *"what
changed in the last 30 minutes?"* and gets back a short, ranked answer across metrics, logs and traces, with the
service where the failure **started** at the top and its echoes in other services labelled as such.
> *Spoor* (n.): the track or trail left by an animal. Spoor follows the trail a failure leaves in your telemetry back
> to where it started.
```
$ spoor what-changed --since 30m
```
```json
{
"summary": "11 change(s) in 3 services. Strongest: payment — Failures start here, in \"POST /charge\" (100% of 100 failed traces). Also: payment — Span \"POST /charge\" errors 0.2% → 43.7% (229 spans). … Errors not significantly up (not new) in: product-catalog, recommendation, ad.",
"findings": [
{"service": "payment", "signal": "traces", "kind": "error_origin", "score": 0.99, "title": "Failures start here, in \"POST /charge\" (100% of 100 failed traces)"},
{"service": "payment", "signal": "logs", "kind": "new_log_pattern", "score": 0.94, "title": "New error log pattern: \"charge failed: card processor returned <N> for order <N>\""},
{"service": "payment", "signal": "metrics", "kind": "error_rate_up", "score": 0.92, "title": "Error rate up: 0.2% → 40.5%", "onset": "2026-10-16T09:50:00Z"},
{"service": "checkout", "signal": "logs", "kind": "spiking_log_pattern", "score": 0.74, "title": "Error log pattern spiking: \"call to payment.Charge failed with status <N>\" — originates in payment"}
],
"coverage": {"metrics": "ok", "logs": "ok", "traces": "ok"}
}
```
Findings carry evidence links to the query behind them (when the token budget allows), so a human can check the
agent's work in one click.
## Why use it
In a microservice failure, the broken service and every caller of it all light up. An agent with only raw query
tools has to decide what to query, compare against "normal" itself, page through results and work out which
service is the cause and which are echoes. It burns tool calls and tokens, and often blames the loudest symptom or
an error that was always there.
Spoor does that work in plain, deterministic Go and hands the agent the conclusion's evidence:
- **Cross-signal:** request rate, error rate, latency, CPU, memory and consumer lag; new and spiking errors and
error volume from logs; per-span errors and latency, all for the same window against the same baseline.
- **Built for real logs:** messages that differ only by IDs, values, stack traces or log prefixes count as one error;
JSON errors are read by their message and code fields; services
can use different level fields or put the level in the text; `spoor doctor` finds your fields and writes the config.
- **Cause vs. echo:** trace trees show where failures start and where latency is added. Callers that merely
suffer are demoted and labelled `— originates in payment`.
- **Steady errors called out:** errors that were already there are listed as `steady_errors`, "not a new problem",
so agents stop blaming them.
- **Bounded output:** every tool takes `budget_tokens` (default 800).
- **Honest about gaps:** `coverage` says when a backend failed or had no data, the baseline was empty, the error
filter matched nothing, or lines lack a service or level field. "No change" never stands in for "can't see".
- **No LLM inside, read-only, redacted:** same input, same output; only query endpoints are ever called; every text
field is scrubbed of emails, tokens, IPs and generated IDs before it leaves.
### Measured
The [benchmark](docs/benchmark.md) runs Claude Code headless on six incidents (five faults and a no-fault control),
five times each, once with the official VictoriaMetrics MCP servers alone and once with Spoor added.
On Claude Haiku, 60 isolated sessions:
| | Official Victoria MCP servers | + Spoor |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Correct root cause, fault scenarios | 19/25 | **25/25** |
| Correct answer, all scenarios incl. "nothing is wrong" | 23/30 | **30/30** |
| Median tool calls per investigation | 24 | **10** |
| Median time | 55 s | **23 s** |
| Total cost | $0.60 | **$0.19** (−68%) |
Synthetic incidents and one small model, so treat it as a first data point.
**On real production logs** (about 25 services, mixed formats, read-only replay): the digest was 99.8% smaller than the
raw evidence it replaces, with zero candidates against four from v0.1.1, and its baseline counts matched independent
queries exactly. It was not faster than four hand-written queries (28 s vs 26 s), and accuracy on real incidents is
not yet measured.
Method, per-scenario results, the production replay and caveats: [docs/benchmark.md](docs/benchmark.md).
## Quickstart
Requires Go 1.25+, Docker and `jq`. About five minutes.
```sh
git clone https://github.com/asinha07/spoor && cd spoor
make it-up # empty VictoriaMetrics, VictoriaLogs, VictoriaTraces in Docker
make demo-data # six synthetic incidents; ground truth in scenarios/out/
make build
T=scenarios/out/payment-failure.truth.json
./bin/spoor what-changed --since $(jq -r .since $T) --until $(jq -r .until $T) --pretty
```
Connect it to Claude Code:
```sh
claude mcp add spoor \
-e SPOOR_METRICS_URL=http://localhost:8428 \
-e SPOOR_LOGS_URL=http://localhost:9428 \
-e SPOOR_TRACES_URL=http://localhost:10428 \
-- "$PWD/bin/spoor" serve
```
Run it from the `spoor` directory (or add `-s user` to register it everywhere), then ask Claude: *"Something is
failing in the shop. What changed, and where did it start?"*
On your own backends, start with `spoor doctor --since 15m`: it checks what Spoor can see and suggests config.
Other clients, Grafana-only access and the rest: **[Getting started](docs/getting-started.md)**.
### Backends
Each signal picks its backend with `type:`, and you can mix them:
| | Metrics | Logs | Traces |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| VictoriaMetrics stack | VictoriaMetrics | VictoriaLogs | VictoriaTraces |
| Grafana stack | Prometheus, Mimir, Thanos | Loki | Tempo |
| New Relic | Transaction events (NRQL) | Log events | Span events |
```yaml
metrics: {type: prometheus, url: http://prometheus:9090}
logs: {type: loki, url: http://loki:3100}
traces: {type: tempo, url: http://tempo:3200}
```
Setup and what differs per backend (Tempo statistics are sampled; New Relic span changes need the service's metrics to
agree): **[Backends](docs/backends.md)**.
## Tools
| Tool | Returns |
| --- | --- |
| `what_changed` | Ranked changes across all signals, with cause/echo attribution, for one service or all. Start here. |
| `new_errors` | Error log patterns that are new or spiking, with counts, first-seen time and a redacted example. |
| `trace_diff` | Span names that got slower or started failing, with an example trace ID. |
| `list_services` | Services in the window and which signals have data for each. |
Inputs: `service`, `since`, `until`, `baseline` (`previous`, `1d`, `7d`), `budget_tokens`.
Full reference: [docs/tools.md](docs/tools.md).
## How it works
```mermaid
flowchart LR
Agent[AI agent / CLI] -->|MCP| S[Spoor]
S -->|"PromQL / NRQL"| M[(VictoriaMetrics, Prometheus, New Relic)]
S -->|"LogsQL / LogQL / NRQL"| L[(VictoriaLogs, Loki, New Relic)]
S -->|"LogsQL / TraceQL / NRQL"| T[(VictoriaTraces, Tempo, New Relic)]
S -->|"ranked digest ≤ budget"| Agent
```
For a window and a baseline (by default, the six windows just before it), Spoor scores every metric with a robust
z-score, compares error-log patterns with a Poisson test, compares span error rates and p95s, walks failed traces to
the span where each failure started, boosts changes confirmed by more than one signal, and trims the result to the
token budget. Details: [architecture](docs/architecture.md) · [scoring and attribution](docs/how-it-works.md).
## Run it for a team
`spoor serve --http :8080 --auth-token …` serves MCP over streamable HTTP with bearer-token auth, `/healthz` and
Prometheus `/metrics`. Ready-made, hardened manifests:
- Kubernetes (Kustomize): [`deploy/kubernetes/`](deploy/kubernetes/)
- Docker Compose: [`deploy/docker/`](deploy/docker/)
- systemd: [`deploy/systemd/`](deploy/systemd/)
Security, sizing, monitoring and upgrades: **[Production guide](docs/production.md)**.
## Verified on the OpenTelemetry Demo
On the [OpenTelemetry Demo](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-demo) v3.1.0 (about 20 real
services), a 50% payment failure came back as "payment: failures start here, in `charge`", with checkout and
frontend errors labelled "originates in payment" (732 tokens); the `adHighCpu` fault came back as the single
finding "ad: CPU up 0.07 → 3.97 cores" (192 tokens). Reproduce it: [`deploy/demo/`](deploy/demo/README.md).
## Documentation
| | |
| --- | --- |
| [Getting started](docs/getting-started.md) | Install, try, connect an agent |
| [Production](docs/production.md) | Kubernetes, Docker, systemd, security, monitoring |
| [Backends](docs/backends.md) | VictoriaMetrics stack, Prometheus, Loki, Tempo, New Relic |
| [Configuration](docs/configuration.md) | Every option and recipes for common setups |
| [Tools](docs/tools.md) | Inputs and response format |
| [Architecture](docs/architecture.md) · [How it works](docs/how-it-works.md) | Design and scoring |
| [Benchmark](docs/benchmark.md) · [Comparison](docs/comparison.md) | Why use it, and what else exists |
| [Troubleshooting](docs/troubleshooting.md) · [FAQ](docs/faq.md) | When something looks wrong |
## Status and limitations
Early (pre-1.0). Tool output fields may still change between minor versions; see the [changelog](CHANGELOG.md).
- The scoring was developed and benchmarked on the VictoriaMetrics stack. Prometheus, Loki and Tempo pass the same
scenario tests against real containers; New Relic was checked on one real account. Tempo statistics are sampled,
and New Relic span changes are reported only when service metrics agree; see [backends](docs/backends.md).
- Cause/echo attribution needs traces; without them Spoor still ranks metric and log changes.
- Attribution reads at most 50,000 span rows per read; on very busy systems a trace can be cut.
- The benchmark uses synthetic incidents written by the author and one model; treat it as a first data point, and
replay your own past incidents with [`bench/replay.py`](bench/replay.py) before relying on it.
- Metrics and traces are queried per service; on large estates pass `service` when you know it.
More in [how-it-works.md](docs/how-it-works.md#known-limitations).
## Roadmap
Next: accuracy on labelled real incidents, "since the last deploy" windows, Datadog and Elasticsearch backends,
exact Tempo statistics through TraceQL metrics. The full list, and what is deliberately out of scope:
**[docs/roadmap.md](docs/roadmap.md)**.
## Contributing
Issues and pull requests are welcome. `make test` needs nothing but Go; see [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md).
Security issues: [SECURITY.md](SECURITY.md).
## License
Apache-2.0. See [LICENSE](LICENSE).
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct signal scope: list_services inventories services, new_errors is log-specific, trace_diff is trace-specific, and what_changed is the cross-signal ranked entry point. The only soft overlap is that what_changed subsumes findings from new_errors and trace_diff, but its 'start here' framing and ranked-summary output keep the boundary workable.
All names use snake_case casing, but the conventions are mixed: list_services is verb_noun, new_errors is adjective_noun, trace_diff is noun_noun, and what_changed is a question-phrase. Readable and memorable, but there is no predictable verb_noun pattern an agent can rely on.
Four tools for a baseline-diffing observability server is well-scoped: one inventory, one per signal (logs, traces), and one aggregator. Each tool clearly earns its place with no gratuitous or redundant entries.
The surface covers service inventory, log errors, trace regressions, and a unified change ranking, which handles the core diagnostic workflow. Gaps are minor: no metric-specific diff tool (metrics only surface inside what_changed), no raw log/span search, and no way to configure the comparison window or baseline.