Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to dev-workflow-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code to query a local, import-aware graph of a repository, so questions like who calls a function, what breaks if it changes, and what imports a file are answered in one lookup instead of a search-and-read loop. It also persists durable session notes and offers full-text search over past session transcripts, all through MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code and Codex assistants to research and read/write a team's knowledge base, manage projects and files, and use integrations through MCP tools.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT to operate authorized local projects through MCP, including reading and modifying code, viewing Git changes, running configured programs, and reading local Codex sessions to continue work.
      53 npm
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action and resource: reading a file, listing structure, searching code, checking git state, getting a review checklist, and generating a commit message. The only mild overlap is between git_info and generate_commit_message, both touching repository state, but their descriptions clearly separate status inspection from staged-diff retrieval.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (read_project_file, list_project_structure, search_code, generate_commit_message). Two deviate to noun phrases (git_info, code_review_checklist), which is a minor inconsistency but still readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a focused dev-workflow helper, with each tool covering a distinct facet of inspecting and preparing code changes. No redundant or filler tools pad the set.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers reading, searching, git inspection, and review/commit prep, but it has no write or edit operations despite descriptions referencing 'before editing' and 'before committing' changes. There is no tool to actually apply edits or perform the commit, leaving a notable lifecycle gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues