Skip to main content
Glama
ashwinmridul

mcp-repo-health

by ashwinmridul
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-repo-health

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • codescan-mcp

      yifanyifan897645
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Scans codebases for TODOs, FIXMEs, code complexity, file stats, and dependencies, generating a health report with a letter grade. Zero configuration required.
      33 npm
      MIT

    • Shipshape MCP

      aranlucas
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables maintainers to prioritize maintenance across GitHub repositories by converting repository, branch, CI, security, and release signals into deterministic, evidence-backed scores and ranked actions.
      MIT

    • @mcpx-digital/readme-score

      TheoryofShadows
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables scoring a local markdown documentation file out of 100 across categories like title, install, usage, license, badges, structure, and relative link resolution, with letter grades and a concrete list of fixes. It works on local files only, providing a heuristic checklist of documentation completeness rather than judging code quality, security, or SEO.
      3
      MIT

    • mcp-shipcheck

      mcp-tool-shop-org
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Audits local package folders to generate publish-readiness reports and previews of NPM tarball contents. It helps developers identify and resolve configuration issues like missing types or broken exports before releasing code.
      3
      61 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools are related but distinct: score_repo provides an overall health score, while list_hygiene_gaps returns only the failing checks. An agent could confuse them if it wants a summary versus details, but the descriptions clarify the difference.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools use a verb_noun pattern (score_repo, list_hygiene_gaps), which is consistent. The second tool's noun phrase is more descriptive than the first, but the pattern is still predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the thin side for a repository health server, but the scope is narrow and the two tools cover the core need. It feels slightly minimal but not unreasonable.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers scoring and listing gaps, but lacks operations like getting detailed check results, generating reports, or fixing/ignoring specific hygiene issues. The core workflow is present, but there are notable gaps for a health-check domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources