create-note-in-folder

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses two key behaviors: the HTML-without-newlines constraint and the failure when the folder doesn't exist. However, it omits other relevant context such as authentication requirements, idempotency, or response shape, but those partially covered by output schema. Overall, moderate transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three concise sentences with no fluff. The purpose is front-loaded, and each sentence contributes: purpose, content constraint, and failure mode with mitigation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 3-param create tool with an output schema, the description is adequately complete. It covers the core purpose, key input constraints, and a common error condition. It doesn't explain folder format or return value, but the output schema likely covers the latter. Slight gap in folder parameter semantics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% coverage, so the description must compensate. It adds meaning for 'content' (must be HTML without newlines) and 'folder' (must exist). It does not clarify whether folder expects a name or ID, and gives no detail on 'title'. Partial compensation, but gaps remain.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Create a new Apple Note inside a specific folder,' using a specific verb and resource that distinguishes it from siblings like create-note. The scope ('specific folder') is explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear usage context: use this tool to create a note in a specific folder, and indicates a prerequisite: check list-folders first to avoid failure. It does not explicitly name alternatives like create-note, but the guidance is helpful.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.