Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to routstr-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Pay-per-request AI with Bitcoin Lightning: Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and more. Load a prepaid spend token, no account or provider API keys. You only pay for successful calls.
      5
      223 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Lightning Network trust oracle for AI agents. Provides real-time node reachability checks, trust scores, and personalized pathfinding for 17,000+ Lightning nodes via 12 MCP tools.
      3 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to send prompts to multiple hosted language models with prompts encrypted on the local machine to a verified GPU-TEE enclave key, returning answers with per-call costs and signed receipts. Also supports side-by-side model comparison, balance and spend checks, and on-demand enclave attestation verification.
      5
      318 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides tools for AI agents to access Bitcoin, Lightning Network, and Nostr knowledge, including real-time network statistics and Web of Trust reputation data. It features an integrated Lightning Network payment system for micro-transactions and query-based interactions.
      12
      6 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct action: discovery (find_models), single-model query (ask), multi-model comparison (council), and wallet inspection (balance). The only close pair, ask vs council, is explicitly separated by 'one model' vs '2 to 5 models at once'. An agent can select correctly from names alone.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names mix verbs (ask, find_models) with bare nouns (council, balance), so there is no predictable verb_noun pattern. Each name is still short and readable, but the convention is inconsistent across the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is on the thin side but each maps to a genuine step in the workflow: find a model, query one, compare several, check funds. Nothing is redundant and nothing feels bolted on.

    Completeness3/5

    The read/query lifecycle is covered, but there is no tool to actually add sats to the balance (only a description of 'how to add more'), and no request/cost history for auditing spend. These gaps force agents into dead ends for anything beyond a one-shot query.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues