Skip to main content
Glama
ashafizullah

monid-mcp

by ashafizullah
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to monid-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • tinyroe

      haolamnm
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides TinyFish's free web, news, and academic search plus URL-to-markdown content fetching via a lightweight API-key-secured MCP server with no OAuth flow.
      2
      1
      MIT

    • scrapesearch-mcp

      tonmoy-dhroubo
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides web search scraping from DuckDuckGo (with Mojeek fallback) and URL content fetching as markdown/text or raw HTML.
      1
      -

    • tinyfish-search-fetch-mcp

      dummie21
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server enabling web search and content fetching via TinyFish Free Access API with support for single and burst URL fetch.
      3
      MIT

    • google-surf-mcp

      tamir-ariunsukh
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides Google search, URL extraction, and academic paper inline extraction without API keys, enabling search and content retrieval from a single MCP server.
      5
      296 npm
      MIT

    • searxng-mcp

      BG-Titan
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to perform web searches through a self-hosted SearXNG instance, offering privacy-focused metasearch without API keys or vendor lock-in.
      3
      BSD 3-Clause
    Deploy Server
    Give agents eyes on the webHosted screenshot MCP. Send a URL, get a pixel-perfect image. $0.002 per grab. Works with Claude, Cursor, and Codex.grabbit.liveAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    web_search is for discovering relevant URLs, while web_extract is for pulling content from specific URLs. There is no overlap between the two, and they form a clear complementary pipeline.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same web_ prefix plus an action verb pattern: web_search and web_extract. The naming is consistent, predictable, and immediately readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    At two tools, the server feels thin and sits at the borderline end of the scale. However, each tool serves a distinct and necessary purpose for a focused web search and extraction workflow.

    Completeness5/5

    The core workflow of searching the web and then extracting readable content from chosen URLs is fully covered. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations within the apparent scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources