get_bundle

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must bear the full burden. It discloses the HTTP method GET (via the endpoint), implying a read-only operation, but does not mention auth requirements, error behaviors, or response format. The description adds little beyond the function name and parameter schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence including the endpoint, front-loading the action and resource. No wasted words; every element contributes to identifying the tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema, yet the description does not mention what the response contains or any special behaviors. While the tool is simple, the description lacks essential context such as expected return structure or prerequisite conditions, making it incomplete for an agent to fully understand the invocation outcome.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with bundle_id described as '方案 ID'. The description's '檢視指定方案' implies the parameter selects which bundle to view, but adds no detail beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema already fully documents the parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states '檢視指定方案' (view specified bundle) with the REST endpoint GET /v1/bundles/{bundle_id}. This clearly identifies a specific verb (view) and resource (specified bundle), distinguishing it from sibling list_bundles (list all bundles) and get_bundle_item (view an item within a bundle).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention that this tool is for retrieving a single bundle by ID, nor does it exclude cases where list_bundles or get_bundle_item would be more appropriate. Usage must be inferred from the endpoint and parameter.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.