Skip to main content
Glama
aself101

MCP Security Framework

by aself101

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Security Framework

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables developers to build production-grade MCP servers with secure defaults, validated inputs, and CI security audits from the first commit.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables developers to scaffold secure-by-default MCP servers with deny-all permissions, typed tool stubs, and pre-wired audit hooks, while enforcing security posture through CI.
      2 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A deliberately small MCP server that demonstrates security hardening against the OWASP MCP Top 10 with tools for file search, record queries, and document fetching, each defended against path traversal, SQL injection, and SSRF.
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A safety-first MCP server enabling file inspection/editing, allowlisted command execution, process listing, and optional desktop automation. It emphasizes security with disabled writes/commands/GUI by default and local feature gates.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables deploying production-ready MCP servers with built-in authentication, rate limiting, data desensitization, audit logging, and session isolation, ready for Kubernetes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Drop-in security primitives for MCP servers, addressing isError compliance, audit trails, input validation, output sanitization, and OAuth scoping.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct domain (calculator, database, echo, file reading, HTTP, image processing, parsing) with no functional overlap, making them easy to distinguish.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'debug-<noun>' pattern with hyphens, providing a clear and predictable naming convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a debugging/testing framework, covering essential operations without excess.

    Completeness5/5

    The tools cover a broad range of typical debugging scenarios (arithmetic, database, file I/O, HTTP, image processing, parsing) with safety restrictions, leaving no obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues