Skip to main content
Glama
as9978

designfit

by as9978
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to designfit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • kiyas

      saiffmirza
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI design fidelity — compare Figma designs or screenshots against the rendered implementation and get structured discrepancies. Uses your Claude Code or Codex subscription, no API keys.
      3
      1
      MIT

    • one-shot-ui

      TN0123
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Deterministic screenshot diffing for AI coding agents. Extract design tokens, diff implementations vs reference, get CSS fix suggestions.
      97 npm
      5
      MIT

    • Figma Context MCP

      cola-sk
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Converts Figma designs into structured code context with token-aware styling, enabling AI agents to generate production-level frontend code.
      1
      9 npm
      MIT

    • Design GL

      talkstream
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to audit rendered web pages for design and UI defects by measuring geometry, styles, contrast and motion in a local browser and judging them against evidence-tiered rules. Findings come back as short, fixable items expressed in the project's own design tokens, while only sanitized numeric measurements leave the machine.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct roles: designfit_extract produces the design spec from a Figma frame, while designfit_validate consumes that spec to check a rendered page. Their descriptions explicitly chain them (extract → validate), leaving no ambiguity about which to call when.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same `designfit_<verb>` pattern with snake_case, and the verbs (extract, validate) accurately describe each action.

    Tool Count3/5

    Only two tools for the server's scope, which is borderline thin. The extract/validate pairing is well-chosen, but the surface is minimal and could justify helpers (e.g. token setup, batch validation).

    Completeness4/5

    The extract→validate pipeline fully covers the core workflow, from Figma frame to fidelity score and fix-list, including a way to bypass the REST fetch by passing raw nodes. Minor gaps exist around configuration/token setup and reporting, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources