get_connection_info
Get current FTP connection information for the z/OS mainframe to verify session status.
Instructions
Get current connection information for the mainframe
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Get current FTP connection information for the z/OS mainframe to verify session status.
Get current connection information for the mainframe
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description bears full burden. It only says 'Get current connection information' without disclosing side effects, restrictions, or any behavioral traits. The agent has no insight into read-only nature or dependencies.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. Perfectly concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema and no details on what 'connection information' includes. For a simple info tool, more specifics (e.g., 'including host, port, status') would improve completeness. Description is vague.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has zero parameters, so baseline is 4. Schema description coverage is 100% trivially. Description adds no parameter info but none is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get current connection information for the mainframe' clearly states the verb (get) and resource (connection information). It is distinct from sibling tools, which are all download/list operations, so no confusion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use or when to avoid this tool. No mention of alternatives or context. The description only states what it does, not when to invoke it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/arunkumars-mf/zos-ftp-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server