dsh-linear-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to dsh-linear-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Linear's API to manage issues, projects, and teams. Supports creating, updating, searching, and deleting issues, along with project management and team operations through API key authentication.13586 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceMulti-workspace Linear MCP server using Personal API Keys instead of OAuth. Provides tools for managing issues, projects, teams, and more across multiple workspaces.571MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables reading and managing Linear issues by human-readable ID, with tools for searching, creating, updating, commenting, and resolving teams, states, labels, and assignees by name.11-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Linear resources through an MCP interface, offering functionality for issue management and resource retrieval with rate limiting and error handling support.1,314 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for Linear that enables listing teams, cycles, and issues, and searching issues via the Linear API.5586 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables interaction with Linear.app's API for issue tracking, project management, and workflow automation. It allows users to create, update, and search issues, manage cycles and labels, and perform team operations through natural language.-
TDQS
Scored across 22 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action. The three issue listing tools (search, list, list_my) have clear differences: full-text search, filterable list, and self-assigned list. All other tools (comments, relations, entities) are mutually exclusive.
All tools follow the uniform pattern 'linear_<verb>_<noun>' with snake_case. Verbs are consistent (get, list, create, update, delete, add, search, archive) and nouns are clear. No mixed conventions or vague verbs.
At 22 tools, the count is slightly above the typical 3-15 range but not excessive. The size is justified by the breadth of Linear entities (issues, comments, relations, teams, users, projects, cycles, labels, workflow states) and the comprehensive issue lifecycle coverage. It feels a bit heavy but each tool serves a distinct purpose.
Issue management is fully covered with create, read (get/list/search), update, archive, and delete. Comments and relations have complete CRUD-like coverage. However, non-issue entities (teams, users, projects, cycles, labels, workflow states) only have list operations, lacking get/create/update/delete. This is a minor gap given the server's apparent issue-centric focus.