kaggle-mcp
Kaggle MCP-Server (Model Context Protocol)
Dieses Repository enthält einen MCP-Server (Model Context Protocol) ( server.py ), der mit der Bibliothek fastmcp erstellt wurde. Er interagiert mit der Kaggle-API und bietet Tools zum Suchen und Herunterladen von Datensätzen sowie eine Eingabeaufforderung zum Generieren von EDA-Notebooks.
Projektstruktur
server.py: Die FastMCP-Serveranwendung. Sie definiert Ressourcen, Tools und Eingabeaufforderungen für die Interaktion mit Kaggle..env.example: Eine Beispieldatei für Umgebungsvariablen (Kaggle-API-Anmeldeinformationen). Benennen Sie die Datei in.envum und geben Sie Ihre Daten ein.requirements.txt: Listet die erforderlichen Python-Pakete auf.pyproject.toml&uv.lock: Projektmetadaten und gesperrte Abhängigkeiten füruvPaketmanager.datasets/: Standardverzeichnis, in dem heruntergeladene Kaggle-Datensätze gespeichert werden.
Related MCP server: Kaggle-MCP
Aufstellen
Klonen Sie das Repository:
git clone <repository-url> cd <repository-directory>Erstellen Sie eine virtuelle Umgebung (empfohlen):
python -m venv venv source venv/bin/activate # On Windows use `venv\Scripts\activate` # Or use uv: uv venvAbhängigkeiten installieren: Verwenden von pip:
pip install -r requirements.txtOder mit UV:
uv syncRichten Sie die Kaggle-API-Anmeldeinformationen ein:
Methode 1 (empfohlen): Umgebungsvariablen
Erstellen Sie
.envDateiÖffnen Sie die
.envDatei und fügen Sie Ihren Kaggle-Benutzernamen und API-Schlüssel hinzu:KAGGLE_USERNAME=your_kaggle_username KAGGLE_KEY=your_kaggle_api_keySie erhalten Ihren API-Schlüssel auf Ihrer Kaggle-Kontoseite (
Account>API>Create New API Token). Dadurch wird einekaggle.jsonDatei mit Ihrem Benutzernamen und Schlüssel heruntergeladen.
Methode 2:
kaggle.json-DateiLaden Sie Ihre
kaggle.jsonDatei von Ihrem Kaggle-Konto herunter.Platzieren Sie die Datei
kaggle.jsonam erwarteten Speicherort (normalerweise~/.kaggle/kaggle.jsonunter Linux/macOS oderC:\Users\<Your User Name>\.kaggle\kaggle.jsonunter Windows). DiekaggleBibliothek erkennt diese Datei automatisch, wenn die Umgebungsvariablen nicht gesetzt sind.
Ausführen des Servers
Stellen Sie sicher, dass Ihre virtuelle Umgebung aktiv ist.
Führen Sie den MCP-Server aus:
uv run kaggle-mcpDer Server wird gestartet und registriert seine Ressourcen, Tools und Eingabeaufforderungen. Sie können über einen MCP-Client oder kompatible Tools mit ihm interagieren.
Ausführen des Docker-Containers
1. Kaggle-API-Anmeldeinformationen einrichten
Für den Zugriff auf Kaggle-Datensätze sind für dieses Projekt Kaggle-API-Anmeldeinformationen erforderlich.
Gehen Sie zu https://www.kaggle.com/settings und klicken Sie auf „Neues API-Token erstellen“, um Ihre
kaggle.jsonDatei herunterzuladen.Öffnen Sie die Datei
kaggle.jsonund kopieren Sie Ihren Benutzernamen und Schlüssel in eine neue.envDatei im Projektstamm:
KAGGLE_USERNAME=your_username
KAGGLE_KEY=your_key2. Erstellen Sie das Docker-Image
docker build -t kaggle-mcp-test .3. Führen Sie den Docker-Container mit Ihrer .env-Datei aus
docker run --rm -it --env-file .env kaggle-mcp-testDadurch werden Ihre Kaggle-Anmeldeinformationen automatisch als Umgebungsvariablen in den Container geladen.
Serverfunktionen
Der Server stellt über das Model Context Protocol die folgenden Funktionen bereit:
Werkzeuge
search_kaggle_datasets(query: str):Sucht auf Kaggle nach Datensätzen, die der angegebenen Abfragezeichenfolge entsprechen.
Gibt eine JSON-Liste der 10 am besten übereinstimmenden Datensätze mit Details wie Referenz, Titel, Downloadanzahl und Datum der letzten Aktualisierung zurück.
download_kaggle_dataset(dataset_ref: str, download_path: str | None = None):Lädt Dateien für einen bestimmten Kaggle-Datensatz herunter und entpackt sie.
dataset_ref: Die Dataset-Kennung im Formatusername/dataset-slug(z. B.kaggle/titanic).download_path(optional): Gibt an, wohin der Datensatz heruntergeladen werden soll. Wenn dieser Pfad weggelassen wird, wird standardmäßig./datasets/<dataset_slug>/relativ zum Speicherort des Serverskripts verwendet.
Eingabeaufforderungen
generate_eda_notebook(dataset_ref: str):Generiert eine für ein KI-Modell (wie Gemini) geeignete Eingabeaufforderung, um ein grundlegendes EDA-Notebook (Exploratory Data Analysis) für die angegebene Kaggle-Datensatzreferenz zu erstellen.
Die Eingabeaufforderung verlangt Python-Code zum Laden von Daten, zur Überprüfung fehlender Werte, zu Visualisierungen und zu grundlegenden Statistiken.
Verbindung zu Claude Desktop herstellen
Gehen Sie zu Claude > Einstellungen > Entwickler > Konfiguration bearbeiten > claude_desktop_config.json, um Folgendes einzuschließen:
{
"mcpServers": {
"kaggle-mcp": {
"command": "kaggle-mcp",
"cwd": "<path-to-their-cloned-repo>/kaggle-mcp"
}
}
}Anwendungsbeispiel
Ein KI-Agent oder MCP-Client könnte folgendermaßen mit diesem Server interagieren:
Agent: „Durchsuchen Sie Kaggle nach Datensätzen zum Thema ‚Herzkrankheiten‘“
Der Server führt
search_kaggle_datasets(query='heart disease')aus.
Agent: „Laden Sie den Datensatz ‚user/heart-disease-dataset‘ herunter.“
Der Server führt
download_kaggle_dataset(dataset_ref='user/heart-disease-dataset')aus.
Agent: „Generieren Sie eine EDA-Notebook-Eingabeaufforderung für ‚user/heart-disease-dataset‘“
Der Server führt
generate_eda_notebook(dataset_ref='user/heart-disease-dataset')aus.Der Server gibt eine strukturierte Eingabeaufforderungsnachricht zurück.
Agent: (Sendet die Eingabeaufforderung an ein Code generierendes Modell) -> Empfängt EDA-Python-Code.
Available Tools
2 toolsdownload_kaggle_datasetC
Downloads files for a specific Kaggle dataset. Args: dataset_ref: The reference of the dataset (e.g., 'username/dataset-slug'). download_path: Optional. The path to download the files to. Defaults to '/datasets/'.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| dataset_ref | Yes | ||
| download_path | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It states the action but lacks critical details: whether authentication is required (Kaggle typically needs API credentials), what happens if files already exist at the path, error handling, or any rate limits. The description is minimal beyond the basic operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is efficiently structured with a clear purpose statement followed by parameter explanations. It avoids unnecessary fluff, though the formatting with 'Args:' could be more integrated. Every sentence adds value, making it appropriately concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of downloading datasets (which often involves authentication, file management, and error cases), no annotations, and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It misses key contextual details like authentication requirements, response format, or handling of large downloads, leaving significant gaps for an agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description adds meaningful context for both parameters: it explains the format of 'dataset_ref' with an example and clarifies the default behavior and path structure for 'download_path'. With 0% schema description coverage, this compensates somewhat, but it doesn't fully detail constraints (e.g., path validity, dataset accessibility).
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Downloads files') and resource ('for a specific Kaggle dataset'), making the purpose immediately understandable. It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'search_kaggle_datasets' by focusing on downloading rather than searching, though it doesn't explicitly contrast them.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While it's implied this is for downloading after a dataset is identified (versus searching with the sibling tool), there's no explicit mention of prerequisites, dependencies, or when-not-to-use scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_kaggle_datasetsC
Searches for datasets on Kaggle matching the query using the Kaggle API.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions using the Kaggle API but doesn't disclose behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, pagination, or what the search returns (e.g., format, fields). This leaves significant gaps for an agent to understand how to use it effectively.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste. It is appropriately sized and front-loaded, directly stating the tool's purpose without unnecessary elaboration.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't cover key aspects like authentication, rate limits, return format, or error handling. For a search tool with no structured support, more context is needed to guide an agent effectively.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It implies the 'query' parameter is used for searching datasets, but doesn't add meaning beyond what the schema's title ('Query') and type suggest. No details on query syntax, examples, or constraints are provided, resulting in minimal added value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Searches for datasets') and target resource ('on Kaggle'), specifying it uses the Kaggle API. It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'download_kaggle_dataset' by focusing on search rather than download, though it doesn't explicitly mention this distinction.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description doesn't mention the sibling tool 'download_kaggle_dataset' or any other search methods, nor does it specify prerequisites like authentication or rate limits.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one downloads a specific dataset, while the other searches for datasets. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose the correct tool for each task without confusion.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (download_kaggle_dataset and search_kaggle_datasets), using snake_case and clear action verbs. This consistency makes the tool set predictable and easy to understand at a glance.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a Kaggle integration, lacking essential operations like listing datasets, uploading data, or managing competitions. While the tools are functional, the scope is incomplete for typical Kaggle workflows, making the count too low for the domain.
The tool set is severely incomplete for a Kaggle MCP server. It covers downloading and searching datasets but misses critical operations such as uploading datasets, accessing competition data, or interacting with notebooks. This creates significant gaps that will hinder agents from performing common Kaggle tasks.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Machine-readable utilities and datasets for AI agents.
List datasets, schemas, run APL queries, and use prompts for exploration, anomalies, and monitoring.
The all-in-one data stack for agents. Upload files, run SQL, evolve tables, and render charts.
Gateway between LLM agents and world data through eight tools and a bundled endpoint catalog.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with the Hugging Face Dataset Viewer API, allowing users to browse, search, filter, and analyze datasets hosted on the Hugging Face Hub.831MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects Claude AI to the Kaggle API through the Model Context Protocol, enabling users to browse competitions, search and download datasets, analyze kernels, and access pre-trained models through natural language interactions.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Kaggle competitions, including listing competitions, downloading files, submitting predictions, and viewing submission history.10
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA full-featured MCP server with 96 tools for the Kaggle API, enabling users to manage competitions, datasets, notebooks, models, discussions, and workflows via natural language.MIT
Appeared in Searches
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/arrismo/kaggle-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server