dashbrr-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to dashbrr-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server exposing Dashy's REST API as tools, enabling an LLM to read and edit dashboard config, including sections, items, and top-level config keys.4MIT

profilarr-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server exposing Profilarr's v1 REST API as tools, enabling an LLM to inspect and manage linked databases, connected Radarr/Sonarr instances, backups, jobs, announcements, and system status.20MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server exposing autobrr's full API as tools, enabling LLMs to read and manage filters, indexers, feeds, clients, actions, releases, and system config. It wraps approximately 104 endpoints into 13 resource-scoped tools for comprehensive autobrr instance management.13MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceMCP server exposing Seerr's full v1 REST API as tools, enabling LLMs to search and discover media, manage requests and approvals, users, issues, watchlists, and integration settings for Plex/Jellyfin/Emby and Sonarr/Radarr, including reads and writes with destructive operations flagged.15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server exposing qbit_manage's Web API as tools, so an LLM can read and manage a qbit_manage instance: run maintenance commands on qBittorrent torrents, manage config files, scheduler, logs, security settings, and system state.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server exposing 72 tools across 26 homelab services, enabling LLMs to monitor and manage infrastructure, media, storage, and networking with a single endpoint.16MIT
TDQS
Scored across 34 tools
Every tool targets a distinct service or resource, e.g., get_sonarr_queue vs get_sonarr_stats, and health check tools are clearly separated by target (dashbrr itself vs configured services). No two tools appear to do the same thing.
All tools follow a consistent dashbrr_<verb>_<noun> pattern, with verbs like get, list, create, delete, set, save, check. The minor plural inconsistency in ui_preferences vs ui_preference doesn't affect predictability.
At 34 tools, the count is heavy, but the server aggregates many distinct services (autobrr, Jellyfin, Traefik, etc.), so the breadth is justified. Still, the number edges into the 'too many' range for a typical MCP server.
The surface covers settings CRUD, per-service monitoring summaries, queue deletion for media managers, Overseerr approvals, and Plex auth flow. Missing are some deeper management actions (e.g., trigger scans), but the core dashboard operations are covered.