bookshelf_delete_tag

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already include destructiveHint: true, and the description's 'DESTRUCTIVE: this deletes data' aligns with that, adding no new information beyond a plain-language restatement. It does not disclose potential cascading effects, irreversibility, or any additional behavioral details, so the contribution over annotations is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is exceptionally concise at two short sentences. It front-loads the core action ('Delete tag') and adds a clear warning. Every word serves a purpose, and there is no unnecessary elaboration.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete operation with annotations and an output schema, the minimal description is somewhat adequate. However, it omits any explanation of the id parameter and potential side effects, such as whether deletion is permanent or affects related entities. The tool's full behavior is not completely documented, leaving some gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one required integer 'id' with zero description coverage. The description does not explain what 'id' refers to or its format. While it may be inferred as the tag ID, the description fails to compensate for the schema's lack of parameter information, leaving the agent to guess.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete tag' clearly states the action with a specific verb and resource. It is unambiguously distinct from sibling tools like list_tag, create_tag, update_tag, and get_tag. The additional 'DESTRUCTIVE: this deletes data' reinforces the tool's purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, such as confirming the tag exists, nor does it offer exclusions or refer to related tools. The only contextual hint is the destructive warning, which is about behavior, not usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.